Merge pull request #7235 from tzilist/master

Add notice in Calls for Testing and add missing section in Final Comment Period for TWiR-624

Author: mariannegoldin

draft/2025-11-05-this-week-in-rust.md

@@ -85,33 +85,11 @@ If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear in this list,
 `call-for-testing` label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or
 guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature need testing.
 
-<!-- If there are new CfT items this week, include:
-
-  [Repo Name](Repo URL)
-    * [<Feature name>](<Feature URL>)
-        * [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
-
-  - and make note in the item so the authors know to remove the `call-for-testing` label:
-This RFC will appear in the **Call for Testing** section of the next issue (#) of This Week in Rust (TWiR).
-You may remove the `call-for-testing` label.  Please feel free to leave the `call-for-testing` label in place if you would like this RFC to appear again in another issue of TWiR.
-
-  - where `Repo Name` and `Repo URL` are one of:
-[Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing),
-[Rust language RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing),
-[Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/labels/call-for-testing) or
-[Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing)
-
-  - and `Testing steps` points directly to the procedures the item wants users to exercise.
-
-  - For all `Repo Names` with no new CfT items this week: use (removing the repos for which new
-     CfT items did appear, of course)
-
 * *No calls for testing were issued this week by
   [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing),
-  [Rust language RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing),
-  [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/labels/call-for-testing) or
+  [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/labels/call-for-testing),
+  [Rust language RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing) or
   [Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing).*
--->
 
 [Let us know](https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/issues) if you would like your feature to be tracked as a part of this list.
 
@@ -275,6 +253,10 @@ which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
 * [Make deref_nullptr deny by default instead of warn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/148122)
 * [Tracking Issue for `const_mul_add`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/146724)
 
+##### [Compiler Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues?q=label%3Amajor-change%20%20label%3Afinal-comment-period) [(MCPs only)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
+
+* [remove support for `typeof`](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/940)
+
 ##### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
 
 * [Guarantee the binary representation of `isize` explicitly](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/2064)