File tree Expand file tree Collapse file tree 2 files changed +4
-4
lines changed Expand file tree Collapse file tree 2 files changed +4
-4
lines changed Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ layout: home
66nav_exclude : true
77has_toc : true
88---
9- ![ EEGLAb sum-up picture] ( /assets/images/tutorial_image.png )
9+ ![ EEGLAB sum-up picture] ( /assets/images/tutorial_image.png )
1010<!-- <a href="https://eeglab.org/workshops/EEGLAB_2022_UCSD.html" style="color:red; font-size:30px">EEGLAB San Diego (Nov 2022) workshop registration open!</a>
1111-->
1212
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -578,13 +578,13 @@ more complex to use. I guess it would also be possible to use the welch
578578method on top of multitaper. It is all a matter of preference. I would
579579advised using the pwelch method which is easy (you just give as an
580580option the length of the windows and the overlap). Multitaper would
581- require you to select the number of basis vector in your othogonal base
581+ require you to select the number of basis vector in your orthogonal base
582582and this is much less intuitive (and also has consequences on the
583583frequency resolution you can achieve).
584584
585- ### Multitaper, FTT , wavelets for time-frequency decomposition?
585+ ### Multitaper, FFT , wavelets for time-frequency decomposition?
586586
587- I have been using the new EELAB toolbox for the past
587+ I have been using the new EEGLAB toolbox for the past
588588couple of weeks, especially timef() and crossf(). The multitaper method
589589with bootstrap statistics has been giving me very nice stable results.
590590Timef() with wavelets gives slightly different results, but also
You can’t perform that action at this time.
0 commit comments