Skip to content

Update CreateNote.java to use attestations instead of vulnerabilities #10177

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update CreateNote.java to use attestations instead of vulnerabilities #10177

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 3 additions & 8 deletions ...r-registry/container-analysis/src/main/java/com/example/containeranalysis/CreateNote.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -41,14 +41,9 @@ public static Note createNote(String noteId, String projectId)
// Associate the Note with the metadata type
// https://cloud.google.com/container-registry/docs/container-analysis#supported_metadata_types
// Here, we use the type "vulnerability"
.setVulnerability(VulnerabilityNote.newBuilder()
.addDetails(VulnerabilityNote.Detail.newBuilder()
.setAffectedCpeUri("your-uri-here")
.setAffectedPackage("your-package-here")
.setAffectedVersionStart(Version.newBuilder()
.setKind(Version.VersionKind.MINIMUM))
.setAffectedVersionEnd(Version.newBuilder()
.setKind(Version.VersionKind.MAXIMUM))))
.setAttestation(AttestationNote.newBuilder()
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot Oct 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The code has been updated to use AttestationNote, but the comment on the preceding line (43) is now outdated as it still refers to 'vulnerability'. To maintain code clarity and prevent confusion, please update the comment to reflect that an 'attestation' note is being created.

Suggested change for line 43:

// Here, we use the type "attestation"

.setHint(AttestationNote.Hint.newBuilder()
.setHumanReadableName("my-attestation-authority")))
.build();

// Initialize client that will be used to send requests. After completing all of your requests,
Expand Down