Skip to content

Conversation

@inbar-beehero
Copy link

Feature or Bugfix

  • Feature (enhancement)

Detail

Allow callers of Athena functions to avoid retrieving the Athena workgroup configuration from the AWS account

Relates

#3233

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

…_workgroup_config to determine if the workgroup config should be retreived from the server
@inbar-beehero inbar-beehero changed the title Enhancement/avoid get workgroup feat: avoid get workgroup Nov 4, 2025
@jaidisido
Copy link
Contributor

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: GitHubCodeBuild8756EF16-4rfo0GHQ0u9a
  • Commit ID: 8a02cb7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@jaidisido
Copy link
Contributor

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: GitHubDistributedCodeBuild6-jWcl5DLmvupS
  • Commit ID: 8a02cb7
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Data Source / Catalog name. If None, 'AwsDataCatalog' will be used by default.
wait
Indicates whether to wait for the query to finish and return a dictionary with the query execution response.
retreive_workgroup_config
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this flag might be redundant. We should let the user override s3_output, encryption, kms key (which we already do), otherwise fall back to default workgroup settings.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your suggestion is definitely an option - it just means that we will never get the settings from the AWS API. Personally I'm fine with that, and ready to change the PR to do so, let me know if it's fine

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I created a 2nd PR to this effect: #3237

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants