Skip to content

Conversation

@timl3136
Copy link
Member

What changed?
Implement signal_with_start_workflow client method

Why?
It's a necessary feature for signaling in python client

How did you test it?
Add an integration test to test signal_with_start.

Potential risks

Release notes

Documentation Changes

timl3136 and others added 3 commits October 30, 2025 13:08
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>

async def signal_with_start_workflow(
self,
workflow: Union[str, Callable],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we require workflow to be WorkflowDefinition?

Suggested change
workflow: Union[str, Callable],
workflow: Union[str, WorkflowDefinition],

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you

Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
…n-client into signal_with_start

Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants